Friday, September 26, 2008

How Do I Fax From Uk To Malaysia

rainbow sky and clouds Ottawa

I am among those who believe that ultimately, any coalition "rainbow" always ends up not being worn out prematurely. Then follows a slow decline, a realignment of political or other issues, the bursting into several parties. A coalition of independence is always a crossroads, because its relevance is still questioned by two groups: (1) political opponents who try to undermine its legitimacy and (2) activists who want to see results. Time is the enemy of any proposed change, and the faithful ally of inaction. The ROC is far from being decaying before our eyes, but what about Quebec?

The Bloc does not escape this logic of "wear the wait" and should make sure not to fall more in the wait. A rainbow, it exists primarily because there are big black clouds ... a ray of sunshine. But this is not the Bloc, which has the power to independence and its position is strategic in Ottawa and it is his political weight that moves certain files. The block is the body of a political lobby Quebec relatively powerful. The lobby represented by the block exerts a constant pressure on the power in Ottawa, forcing the incumbent government to compromise, to avoid occult maneuvers, to look specifically for Quebecers. In this sense, Canadians ROC are right to complain of high interest / too high is that Ottawa to Quebec. But for us it is a matter of cultural survival. Note that there are others in the world, lobbies more or less visible from the same kind, each defending a national or cultural issue.

Do you really believe that the Quebec members being part of the NDP Liberal Party or the Conservative Party can not afford if only one hundredth of attachment to Quebec and Quebec-nation draft? No, to be part of the political parties must believe in a Canada-and Canada-nation project. They need to evacuate especially the "threat of Quebec" from their ranks, since the "dangerous" flirtation Mulroney. This era is well and truly dead, dismembered, buried, decomposed. We even poured salt on his grave, so that the grass will grow back.

What then, if not vote for a "rainbow on the siding!

event of Quebec independence (or a very broad autonomy), there will be room for all political parties consistent with the Constitution of a moral contract, including the parties to liberal, or libertarian social democrat. We must vote first for the pro-independence platform, and then to the left-right alignment. If you do not wish the demise of the Bloc, PQ and other parties, lobby groups and political clubs in the short term, we know very well that after the independence celebrations, it's going to take the ax. For reasons that are best. They are disposable! And the Bloc is still in its original packaging ...

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

How Much Is Half Head Of Highlights

PG-13 A country

"Canadians want to be comfortable with artists who represent them internationally. They will not fund all expenses paid trips to celebrities or to marginal "

- A spokesman for Conservative

" When ordinary working Canadians come home, turn on the television and see a girl or a group people at a rich gala subsidized entirely by taxpayer money, and who say that their subsidies are not high enough when they know they were up ... I'm not sure it resonates with ordinary people. "

- Stephen Harper

"The movies we go to see at theaters and film festivals Will continues to Be eligible for tax credits. The measure Contained in Bill C-10 addresses only The Most extreme and gratuitous material, not mainstream films (...) "

- Josee Verner


Oh ... really?

So let's talk about the films "contrary to public order", "marginal" and "extreme" (to use the vocabulary of fashion in Ottawa). Without funding opportunity, it is almost certain that movies like "CRAZY", "The Decline of the American Empire" (And its two sequels), "Biological Clock", "Le Neg", "Three Little Pigs," "Eldorado," "Night Zoo," "How to make love to a negro without getting tired," or even "LĂ©olo" (especially that one), WOULD NOT SEEN THE DAY. They are all, to varying degrees, contrary to public order and "decency", convey values "questionable" or do not represent the idea that Canada is of himself. In short, good manners, it does not make good movies. But manners free, it does not Good subsidies, it seems.

Other films should, in turn, squirming to get into the ideological mold, or outright cut scenes. What about two small scenes of collective orgasm "suggested" in "the great seduction"? What to do with hatred of the French-Canadian and national affirmation in "Maurice Richard"? How to hide the corpse very disruptive and disturbing scenes in "A crab in the head" or "Possible Worlds" (not counting the flashes of nudity)? Robert Lepage is it a dangerous marginal, it is also gay and French (how shocking)? Might say that "magnets" are a bit too promoting adultery? "Nitro" encourages young people to violate the law and dangerous driving? "Thieves of Innocence" criticism he is too overtly government services? "A few acres of snow" and "orders" they implicitly support terrorism? "Traitor or patriot" is it a documentary-flavored Quebec nationalist? And forget "Mambo Italiano" is far too gay to be reformed!

A pair of buttocks, it's been a bum film - these being cut 3 seconds of pornography that occur in almost all our films, is not it Mr. Pastor? Come on, that we redo all these scenarios with an emphasis on "Canadian values that unite us," on "multiculturalism, bilingual opening" and "good morals". Canada is the beautiful country pluss PG-13, under God of course.

As for small films "too small" to be in theaters in the multiplex where Ms. Verner went on Friday night, they will die in the shade. It's like a cross between the principle of Hygrade sausage and the myth of the ordinary taxpayer. But who wants therefore see movies that nobody will see? Answer: just everybody, Mrs. Verner. Because everyone is marginal in its own way.