Saturday, November 22, 2008

Brazilian Garrote Chocolate

The language spoken in Quebec is quite legitimate

There is much talk these days, standardization of the language called "Quebec" or, more accurately, our dialect. There is even talk of publishing a dictionary, which goes beyond the mere exercise of our list of "regionalism" to make a reference to "good use", so to speak. Here, you wear the hat, mittens and scarf. There, you wear the hat, mittens and scarf. And yet! Some experts and opinion leaders tend to denigrate our linguistic innovations, firing broadsides at anything that moves any less of the "standard Parisian" describing our linguistic heritage "tares" and our innovations " fold on itself. "However, each term adopted by the Francophonie is a small victory, a testament to our strength and our determination cultural" email "is an example can be worn to the cord (overused?), but still valid. But it appears that shelter or handle is an unspeakable horror! hurry we therefore kiffer or bumming is so much more normative and civilized!

I say loud and clear: Quebecers are also entitled to linguistic innovation, such as the feminization of titles (Mrs. J., a professor). Of course, since this is innovation the goal is to accept the terms or agreements to the rest of the Francophonie. Who still says "balloon" for "volleyball"? When the term did not stick, it finally disappears. Difficult to find a balance between the need to name things according to our cultural perspective, and the need to continue to share with the rest of the Francophonie.

In my view, the normative should not be a barrier to linguistic innovation, to regionalism, the proliferation of synonyms if such a thing serves the cultural needs of a francophone group. The usual language is a language and generally comfortable effective in a given socio-cultural space. We will not ask Quebec to define the desert of Mali. Paris will not have the last word on our winter. The normative

must remain permeable to avoid the multiple, it must be sufficiently rigid, otherwise it will have more control. When I translate a text, we sometimes wonder a French text for France, French in Quebec, French for Canada French for international. I bow to the exercise, which is sometimes very difficult. But it confirms that, on the ground, each of these areas of the Francophonie are certified, are recognized, they are respected. Better yet, they overlap or fit together in complex ways. The scalpel language is vague, but it happens to be decided.

Many Quebecers pronounce the words in a way that approximates what is prescribed in the Robert, a pronunciation somewhat idealized, less documented today in Paris or Algiers. I speak here of course of Quebecers who make the effort to speak well without tracing their emphasis on Hochelaga on Joliette or Paris-suburbs. There is something comical to compare French accents to what is prescribed. Is it in Quebec they say "pangouan" for penguin and "jame" forever? We have our shortcomings, our slang, sometimes a shameful legacy, but when we're talking, we speak of an almost crystalline . This is one of many paradoxes that make the Quebec language a funny "Bébitte. Growing

language at home and in export-flavors.


Friday, October 10, 2008

How Does Sleep Eze Work

must hate Dion for the right reasons!

Ah, the joys of live ... unless you live in a hut in Chibougamau, impossible to have missed that famous interview on CTV Dion borked. Everyone talks about it, Harper took advantage, Duceppe moderates the debate. But let's see what happens in the media.

To glean votes, Dion has no choice but to adopt an attitude diametrically opposed to that of Harper. Where Harper is surrounded by a cordon of security, Dion takes walkabouts. Where Harper gave a lecture in a room closed to journalists handpicked, Dion harangue the crowds in the street. Where Harper insists that only shows its best side to the camera carefully disguised, Dion comes to natural, even to look pale. Dion's gaffes are primarily small bumps that is on a cross country track ... but what about Harper, who never leaves the highway facility.

I do not like Dion, I do not hide it - not because of his personality (which is correct in my opinion), but because of his uncompromising vision of federalism that has vision Trudeauist nothing to offer Quebec. But we can still acknowledge the efforts, even clumsy, Dion to be closer to his constituents (which I will not part) - the risks it takes, the energy injected into it, the ideas that he worked tirelessly.

The worst thing is that Harper, who is content to present a sweetened stock and has no campaign platform worthy of the name could very well be re-elected. After that, it will just steal the ideas of his opponents Bloc and Liberals - those who make his case, of course. Her brain can therefore remain comfortably at rest for 2 to 4 years.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Dragonball English Doujinshi

When you want to kill the left, is accused of ... The Bloc

the time of our great-grandparents, activists said that the wicked Tories unionists atheists who are destroying family values, should be excommunicated and burn in hell. Then the days of our grandparents, they said that the wicked Communist unionists should be tried as traitors and executed. Time of our parents, they said that the wicked union separatists should rot in prison with the FLQ. Then today, activists say the Tories nasty unionists of gogauche should shut the hell up because they are the source of all economic problems.

Funny, they are people who are enraged over several generations. The more things change, the conservative activists, and more they stay the same. They just replaced their sermons by priests sermons of so-called economists. But why have these old dogmatic croutons so afraid of social progress, diversity and democracy?

Friday, September 26, 2008

How Do I Fax From Uk To Malaysia

rainbow sky and clouds Ottawa

I am among those who believe that ultimately, any coalition "rainbow" always ends up not being worn out prematurely. Then follows a slow decline, a realignment of political or other issues, the bursting into several parties. A coalition of independence is always a crossroads, because its relevance is still questioned by two groups: (1) political opponents who try to undermine its legitimacy and (2) activists who want to see results. Time is the enemy of any proposed change, and the faithful ally of inaction. The ROC is far from being decaying before our eyes, but what about Quebec?

The Bloc does not escape this logic of "wear the wait" and should make sure not to fall more in the wait. A rainbow, it exists primarily because there are big black clouds ... a ray of sunshine. But this is not the Bloc, which has the power to independence and its position is strategic in Ottawa and it is his political weight that moves certain files. The block is the body of a political lobby Quebec relatively powerful. The lobby represented by the block exerts a constant pressure on the power in Ottawa, forcing the incumbent government to compromise, to avoid occult maneuvers, to look specifically for Quebecers. In this sense, Canadians ROC are right to complain of high interest / too high is that Ottawa to Quebec. But for us it is a matter of cultural survival. Note that there are others in the world, lobbies more or less visible from the same kind, each defending a national or cultural issue.

Do you really believe that the Quebec members being part of the NDP Liberal Party or the Conservative Party can not afford if only one hundredth of attachment to Quebec and Quebec-nation draft? No, to be part of the political parties must believe in a Canada-and Canada-nation project. They need to evacuate especially the "threat of Quebec" from their ranks, since the "dangerous" flirtation Mulroney. This era is well and truly dead, dismembered, buried, decomposed. We even poured salt on his grave, so that the grass will grow back.

What then, if not vote for a "rainbow on the siding!

event of Quebec independence (or a very broad autonomy), there will be room for all political parties consistent with the Constitution of a moral contract, including the parties to liberal, or libertarian social democrat. We must vote first for the pro-independence platform, and then to the left-right alignment. If you do not wish the demise of the Bloc, PQ and other parties, lobby groups and political clubs in the short term, we know very well that after the independence celebrations, it's going to take the ax. For reasons that are best. They are disposable! And the Bloc is still in its original packaging ...