Monique Jerome-Forget, proud of his new shoes, we just lay a budget for a single purpose: to finance the purchase of her new shoes out of the federal payments.
At least that's the conclusion I arrived declaring that the surplus of nearly one billion dollars will go ... not in education (to train entrepreneurs, managers and doctors) ... not in payment of the debt (to reduce our collective debt, and further increase our flexibility) ... but directly into the pockets of the wealthy. Not that we should punish them in any way, our rich, but with our progressive tax system, everyone pays their fair share already. So why have redistributed money this way?
Let's see what the opposition parties have to say!
The Parti Quebecois leaning slightly more towards the side that says Solidarity Lucid said, he would have preferred to see a part (say half) of budget surpluses versed in education (which is in disrepair - except UQAM its premises purchased with Air Miles adulterated) and healthcare (particularly for repatriating physicians by improving their salaries and invest in training new doctors). In short, with Legault and Marois tandem finance, the PQ is at least the merit of being consistent in its pronouncements, which are much less "so-so-so ... immobility" that what the media-gna gna like to introduce ourselves. Legault seems to be very strong now, very confidently, that bodes well for the rest of the match.
The Army Duplessis of Quebec (ADQ) head was so swollen by his recent success at the polls, that his chief bullies no longer have any sense of proportion. They are already cheuffes Quebec, having crushed the PQ, PLQ, QS, the Greens and the unions under their wicked boots polished with wax to démagoguenard. Oh yes: they "bear pants" and they "say out loud what people are thinking to themselves". What panties and what people? We will never know. The ADQ
clearly leans towards said Lucid (and sometimes a little too much, but that's another story). In this sense, their critique rather affects management Generations Fund, for to accelerate the repayment of debt. One of the basic principles of Lucid is to avoid shoveling deficits to future generations (an idea very responsible, we must admit). It could therefore, in all intellectual honesty, qualify the criticism of the ADQ leaders on this issue. At the office
prescritorial La Presse, PLouQistes chief welcomed this budget loudly while drinking a glass of PPPepsi Light, as it should. They do not know exactly why they are satisfied with the budget, but they are satisfied by definition, Alain Dubuc praises the "courage" of the Liberals without too explain what exactly who is brave - perhaps it is the act of listening to the nonsense of Jean Charest for more than 8 hours per day, 5 days a week. Alain Dubuc
obviously trying to convince us that critics of the budget are justified. In their blogs, Liberal activists are trying to emphasize the "inconsistency" criticism of Gilles Taillon (formerly the Employers' Council). As if it was not possible to have a nuanced opinion!
In fact, what has particularly pleased the bosses in this budget, it is certainly not the management of surpluses. A single point is sufficient to put the employers in the pocket of the Liberals: the abolition of the tax on business capital, before 2011 (2012?). For employers, the public debt, infrastructure and basic services arrive Xth position, away from the profit of enterprise and training of interns racking records.
The volte-face Gilles Taillon may be explained by a simple change of priorities. He may have even taken a liking to the Quebec state, now it is headed (oops no, the ADQ is made at the navel). Remains to be seen if a coherent thought or just a bully in pirouette dress parade.
Personally, I find that Ms. Forget has bought shoes absolutely awful, she is overwhelmed with his memory stick (the WiFi is encrypted "in" in 2007, Madam), and the increase in debt is now a pure product Liberal (which can no longer blame their predecessors, that is to say for themselves the state of public finances). Little Miss Madame grieves us to go spend "72 million" in election? It's so sad to hear politicians criticize COSTS of democracy, while their own government is a double minority issues and reach a billion dollars. It's really, really cheap.
I have a theory on this, but shhh, do not repeat too high: Monique Jerome-Forget is actually son Daniel Johnson, with a wig on his noggin, as beardless as usual, and just talking little more acute. It's been over a decade that had not been entitled to a budget neo-liberal ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment