DEBUNK THE STATUE OF BOURGAULT
There is nothing sacred, least of all Pierre Bourgault. What makes me laugh today, this is the way of some people to ride Levesque separatists in the mud while hoisting Bourgault the status of demigod.
Bourgault, this writer who wanted to be a politician!
It's so easy to identify with characters young at heart - coat style leather bum chin to James Dean, depth typically nietzchéenne revolutionary - they have never actually worked to accomplish something something concrete politically, and who complain about their own failures and "betrayal" of their surroundings. A politician who complains about the betrayals of others is like a taxi who complains of being lost in the city.
Bourgault's inability to organize a political party, to reconcile the differing views, to delegate responsibilities and powers, to listen to others talk ... it connects you, friends?
Bourgault has been a well best writer, journalist, polemicist and commentator than a politician.
The INR was more a political club or a social forum, a real party. He would never have been able to bring constitutional changes, much less bring about unilateral secession. It was a forum for political and social revolutionary ideas of the time, relevant but not complete in itself. THE MYTH OF
"PARTY DIFFERENT"
Even today, sellers of ideas are popular, they are Socialists or Libertarians ... they seduce, but what have they really sacrificed to advance Quebec, except to sell books of political analysis self-indulgent, produce tabulations in Microsoft Excel, and complain about the incompetence of suspected villains elected politicians ? The real losers
, these are marginal, these self-proclaimed prophets, who have never been and will never have the power ... but who say, with their air of supreme morality: "Oh if I were prime minister I would do this and that, I would be so much better than these careerists.
Yet these are not photogenic idealistic public support (which they despise, while claiming to understand it!). They have no ability to the concessions necessary to the exercise of power. They fail to convince, complain the media "rogue" or social values "corrupt." They are so noble in their crusade to them. Maybe that deep in themselves they are aware of bear the seeds of their own failure.
SOCIALIST : Have you noticed how the socialist creed that considers the population has not good moral values and that we must educate , even frame it? It sounds like the wailing of social conservatives or credits Caouette!
Libertarian : Have you noticed how the libertarian credo considers all social organization, power manager, as a suspect? It sounds like the revolutionary Trotskyists. The libertarian ideal of breaking down borders, governments, organizations, to release the citizen ... Is not this called the permanent revolution ?
It is easy to sell the idea of "different party" idealism of wall-to-wall, purity of intentions. Present itself as an anti-politician who will revolutionize the Quebec and also run the orangeades in fountains. Just look at the marginal baba-cool of Québec solidaire, who lives literally on the margins of Quebec values real. Or that the ADQ endlessly entangled in its own contradictions. Which political party can boast of having taken more than 15 years before becoming mature, and have always failed? The ADQ!
HOW NOT SEDUCED BY THE QUEBEC
sovereignist If the Left wants to propose a new deal Quebec people, this is certainly not the socialist wing of QS sauce Davido-Khadirienne who manages to push it into the throat of the average Quebec. This, it is NOT a socialist and did not want to become. I feel that there are more green or PQ separatists disappointed that genuine socialists in the electoral base of QS.
These are not revolutionaries separatists who dream of a Party to the pure ideals Bourgaultien, who manage to reconcile the middle class - down-to-earth - with a social project involving major risks. Garroch sovereignty in the face, without a parachute, wearing an unbridled optimism, and you'll get between 0.5% and 5% of the votes.
Draw your own conclusions.
There is nothing sacred, least of all Pierre Bourgault. What makes me laugh today, this is the way of some people to ride Levesque separatists in the mud while hoisting Bourgault the status of demigod.
Bourgault, this writer who wanted to be a politician!
It's so easy to identify with characters young at heart - coat style leather bum chin to James Dean, depth typically nietzchéenne revolutionary - they have never actually worked to accomplish something something concrete politically, and who complain about their own failures and "betrayal" of their surroundings. A politician who complains about the betrayals of others is like a taxi who complains of being lost in the city.
Bourgault's inability to organize a political party, to reconcile the differing views, to delegate responsibilities and powers, to listen to others talk ... it connects you, friends?
Bourgault has been a well best writer, journalist, polemicist and commentator than a politician.
The INR was more a political club or a social forum, a real party. He would never have been able to bring constitutional changes, much less bring about unilateral secession. It was a forum for political and social revolutionary ideas of the time, relevant but not complete in itself. THE MYTH OF
"PARTY DIFFERENT"
Even today, sellers of ideas are popular, they are Socialists or Libertarians ... they seduce, but what have they really sacrificed to advance Quebec, except to sell books of political analysis self-indulgent, produce tabulations in Microsoft Excel, and complain about the incompetence of suspected villains elected politicians ? The real losers
, these are marginal, these self-proclaimed prophets, who have never been and will never have the power ... but who say, with their air of supreme morality: "Oh if I were prime minister I would do this and that, I would be so much better than these careerists.
Yet these are not photogenic idealistic public support (which they despise, while claiming to understand it!). They have no ability to the concessions necessary to the exercise of power. They fail to convince, complain the media "rogue" or social values "corrupt." They are so noble in their crusade to them. Maybe that deep in themselves they are aware of bear the seeds of their own failure.
SOCIALIST : Have you noticed how the socialist creed that considers the population has not good moral values and that we must educate , even frame it? It sounds like the wailing of social conservatives or credits Caouette!
Libertarian : Have you noticed how the libertarian credo considers all social organization, power manager, as a suspect? It sounds like the revolutionary Trotskyists. The libertarian ideal of breaking down borders, governments, organizations, to release the citizen ... Is not this called the permanent revolution ?
It is easy to sell the idea of "different party" idealism of wall-to-wall, purity of intentions. Present itself as an anti-politician who will revolutionize the Quebec and also run the orangeades in fountains. Just look at the marginal baba-cool of Québec solidaire, who lives literally on the margins of Quebec values real. Or that the ADQ endlessly entangled in its own contradictions. Which political party can boast of having taken more than 15 years before becoming mature, and have always failed? The ADQ!
HOW NOT SEDUCED BY THE QUEBEC
sovereignist If the Left wants to propose a new deal Quebec people, this is certainly not the socialist wing of QS sauce Davido-Khadirienne who manages to push it into the throat of the average Quebec. This, it is NOT a socialist and did not want to become. I feel that there are more green or PQ separatists disappointed that genuine socialists in the electoral base of QS.
These are not revolutionaries separatists who dream of a Party to the pure ideals Bourgaultien, who manage to reconcile the middle class - down-to-earth - with a social project involving major risks. Garroch sovereignty in the face, without a parachute, wearing an unbridled optimism, and you'll get between 0.5% and 5% of the votes.
Draw your own conclusions.
0 comments:
Post a Comment